Tuesday, May 19, 2020

Situational Leadership Theory And Organizational Leadership

Situational Leadership Theory and Organizational Leadership Why are some employees happier and more satisfied with their work environment than others? Why are some teams within the same organization more productive than others? How can you get subordinates to trust your decisions, readily cooperate with others and follow your lead? The answer to these questions boils down to one thing; effective leadership. For our purpose, effective leadership can be defined as the art of influencing individuals and groups to accomplish the goals and objectives of the organization (Plunkett, Allan, and Attner, 2013). Effective leadership has a direct impact on the motivation, or lack thereof, of employees and how they interact with others within the organization. Followers will also act in ways that reflect their leaders example, whether it is positive or negative. It is obvious that the leadership culture within our organization is ineffective and employee productivity and morale has slipped to unacceptable levels. Because of our current situation, the following information is presented to you, as managers and supervisors, as a guide to help you become a more effective leader. There are many theories on how best to lead and motivate employees, however, for our purposes, we will concentrate our study and efforts on the situational leadership theories. Situational Leadership Theory and The Leadership Culture One of the ways we can improve our leadership skills is through the studyShow MoreRelatedSituational Leadership Theory And Organizational Leadership1422 Words   |  6 PagesSituational Leadership Theory and Organizational Leadership Dwight D. Eisenhower said, â€Å"Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.† Leadership is the art of directing others in the pursuit of reaching a common goal or desired outcome. At the most essential level, a leader is a person who inspires, encourages and directs others toward fixed goals. Great leaders are able to motivate their team through the coaching, establishment, and settingRead MoreImportance Organizational Leadership Has on Companies Today1657 Words   |  7 PagesAfter reading an article about organizational leadership, I was more enlightened on the value and importance organizational leadership has on companies today. The article discussed the significance of organizational leadership and how leaders can motivate their followers to accomplish corporate objectives and help them realize their full potential. More importantly understanding the organizational leadership theories can support the growth an d development of leadership skills and identify potentialRead MoreSituational Leadership in Hospitality1607 Words   |  7 PagesSituational Leadership in Hospitality If one look at the nature of the hospitality industry, it is serviced-base, it is labor-intensive, it is renowned for its high staff turnover and labor diversity in term of age, culture, and background; one may conclude that the industry is all about people. When people become the most valuable asset of an organization, simply managing them is no longer sufficient to compete in today’s challenging business world. Leadership has become the new key operative wordRead MoreWhy Leaders Cannot Change Their Style1565 Words   |  7 Pagesperson or a group of people. In Great Man theory, some individuals are born or by force of personality reach positions of influence so that they can dominate the directions of others (Buchanan et al, 1997). Those leaders are born to have the ability to take up the leadership positions in any situations. Leadership styles are behaviors displayed by a leader when they encounter both followers and change (Mclaurin Amri, 2008). Nowadays, organizational change has a serious implication for the survivalRead MoreThe Theory Of Leadership Theory940 Words   |  4 PagesChapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn t always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tendRead MoreLeadership And Ethics Of Leadership1448 Words   |  6 PagesLeadership and Ethics Leadership styles and approaches vary from situation to situation, including the personality, knowledge, skills, and abilities of the leader and the followers. Employees teach the leader how to lead them. Their competence, ability, and willingness to complete a task are indicators, which assist the direction of leadership the leader takes. Keeping all of this in mind, we will describe and analyze the Situational and Style leadership approaches. Situational Leadership Read MoreTheories of Leadership Essay example1492 Words   |  6 PagesSituational Leadership: Houses Path-Goal verses Hersey and Blanchards Leadership Model Situational Leadership: Houses Path-Goal verses Hersey and Blanchards Leadership Model Do you ever reflect on someone that had or has such a positive impact on you that when you think of them words like competent, inspiring, intelligent, courageous, respect, and mentor come to mind? Chances are all of us have had or still have someone like this in our lives, and that someone, is an effective leaderRead MoreLeadership Styles And Theories Of Leadership Essay873 Words   |  4 PagesGenerally, leadership is the art or process of influencing followers and subordinates to achieve the organizational goals. It helps an individuals or a group to identify its goals and assists in achieving the stated goals. Because of importance of leadership all kinds of group action, there are considerable number of researches and theories on leadership and many kinds of leadership styles like Greatman theory, power influence, Trait approach, Behavioral, Situational or Contingency approaches;Read MoreThe Theory Of Leadership Theory868 Words   |  4 PagesChapter sixteen discusses vario us leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn t always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tendRead MoreLeadership And Its Theory Of Leadership883 Words   |  4 Pages Leadership Leadership has been around for thousands of years, yet experts are still unable to agree on a universal definition. Perhaps it is because leadership is a complex, multidimensional concept that continuously evolves. Nevertheless, explaining leadership and its theories and approaches is a monumental task (Henman, n.d.). According to Day and Antonakis (2012), leadership is essentially an influencing process. Its effectiveness largely depends on leadership behaviors and followers perceptions

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Original Tonka Truck Manufacturer - 1413 Words

Remember when most boys you knew played with some shape or form of the Tonka Truck. I am talking about the original Tonka Truck Manufacturer. With the end of WWII and the beginning of Christmas 1962 the business of converting or supporting the war effort to something more peace time related was underway. New companies were popping up across the country and three visionary, entrepreneurs seized on an opportunity and Mound Metalcraft Incorporated was formed on September 18, 1946 by Lynn Baker, Alvin Tesch and Avery Crounse. The new company purchased a three story school building built in 1908 near beautiful Lake Minnetonka in Mound, Minnesota. The business model for their new company was to manufacture closet accessories like tie racks and†¦show more content†¦If Tonka wanted to compete with the likes of Buddy L, Marx, Nylint, Structo, Wyandotte and others, they had to diversify their model offering. To that end, Dump trucks, Wreckers, Semis, and Box Vans all made their initia l appearance prior to 1955. By mid-1955, Mound Metalcraft moved into a new manufacturing facility that handled their ever increasing product line and an insatiable appetite by consumers for Tonka trucks. Fast forward #100 Steam Shovel to 1982. (This is a brief history) (http://www.neatoldtoys.com/history.htm) A major blow to Tonka s Minnesota workforce, was that steel truck manufacturing began to move from Minnesota to El Paso, Texas in 1982 with the transfer of equipment and production completed in 1983. Then in 1991, Tonka Toys was purchased by Hasbro Incorporated, the second largest toy company in the U.S.A. In 1998, and still under the Hasbro brand, the steel truck manufacturing was completely moved out of the United States to mainland China. Therefore in today s global manufacturing markets, Made in the U.S.A. takes a backseat if it affects the bottom line. Forward to May 10, 2014, and the Tonka brand is still part of the Hasbro family and is still manufactured in China. The once mighty Tonka brand has been diluted with small plastic trucks. The original factory in Mound, Minnesota looks much the same as it did when it closed in 1982 accept it is home to multiple tenants. The factory in El Paso includes administrative offices, plastic blow

Evaluation Report for Lemon and Camerota - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: How could the interview participants have managed themselves and the interview more effectively? Answer: To know how each and every participant would have done better, it is important to first know the roles and the powers of each and every participant. The ball was more on the side of Lemon and Camerota. The reason for stating so is because they were the ones asking the questions and controlling the whole event(Ghaffar, 2009). With that in mind, it is evident that they would have more control of the interview as compared to Aslan. Aslan was just a person who was in place to contribute to a topic that was already in place. Therefore, his part was like only adding spices to a mean that the menu and ingredients were already provided. The way that each and every person conducted him or herself in the interview has so much to do with what he or she would have done better. Camerota Between Lemon and Camerota, Camerota was the one who contributed much and took more time in the whole interview from the journalists side(Jasperse, 2012). Such is seen where she initiates arguments and goes ahead to a battle with Aslan so as to prove her point. There are different ways that she would have managed the interview more effectively as well as herself. First, a journalist is the voice of the society. Society is diverse, and therefore, it needs a person who stands in the middle and makes all side feel represented and respect. It is evident that Camerota took a side in the whole conversation(Johansen, 2012). The work of the journalists is to make news and to gather information without biases. When a journalist takes a side, it becomes his or her interest and not the interest of the viewers. Why state so? The viewers of the interview might have been Islamic and maybe Christians(Karakus, 2012). It is the responsibility of a journalist not to make a specific population feel like the journalist is against it. Therefore, to manage herself more effectively, Camerota ought not to have taken any position in the debate; her work was to get information from Aslan(Lamarque, 2009). Second, Camerota failed to give Aslan a chance to explain his points at times. By watching the interview, one would realize that sometimes Camerota would cut off Aslan because she wanted to pass a specific point. When one does not give a partner a humble time to prove his or her point, the conversation might turn chaotic. Such was almost the case in some instances; Camerota would stop Aslan from explaining his point. Camerota ought to know that she was at the center of the conversation. Such means that the work was to make sure that allegations that had been made by Maher are proved to be factual or mere personal opinions(Tekleab, 2009). Therefore, the case only called for the contribution of the professional invited and in this case, it is was Aslan. Like Lemon, Camerota was supposed to contain herself and try not to initiate arguments with Aslan. Third, as far as the effective management of the interview is concerned, Camerota failed to stick to her purpose. The best way to bring out the point is by comparing her with her partner(Tsai, 2009). When Lemon started talking, he was calm and straight to point. That is a strategy in journalism that helps the source to provide as much information as possible. In the whole interview, if Camerota were not in the newsroom, one would have confused her for a professional who was brought on board to contribute to the whole debate (Khamilov A.B, 2014). Lemon Lemon is one of the participants who conducted themselves well in the interview. However, there are ways in which he would have managed the interview in a more effective way. Seeing that Lemon was the person who initiated the conversation and introduced the topic, it is more likely that he had the power to control the whole interview (Paula, P,2010). As far as his character is concerned, he did not go past the purpose. However, his partner ought to have been controlled. How would Lemon do so? Lemon would have made sure that not too much is spent by Camerota. The reason for stating so is because Camerota became more of a participant in the conversation than a journalist. Lemon would also have made sure that there were two different people opposing and proposing the topic of discussion. It was not fair to bring one person who only refuted the claims that Islam does not support peace. Though there were remarks from Maher, at the time of discussion, they were not well represented. If the re were an availability of a person who supported the claims of Maher or Maher, the discussion or interview would be effective because it would be representing views from both sides. Aslan Aslan demonstrated that he stands by what he believes in. There are different areas that would have made the interview and the contribution of Aslan more effective. One, at some point, there were arguments between Aslan and Camerota on the issue of discussion. It would have been easy for Aslan to avoid that. First, he would have avoided that by making sure that he gives the journalists an enough time to ask questions. When two people talk at the same time in an interview, it becomes more of just a mere argument than a constructive discussion. There are points when Aslan and Camerota talk at the same time. The worst about it is that they both believed that they were right and that even led to them raising their voices to one another. Aslan, as an active member of the discussion, had a chance to change the scenario(Awad, 2010). Letting Camerota complete what she was talking about would make the interview orderly and smooth. Two, Aslan trashed almost everything that was said by Maher and Camerota. Such was one of the reasons why his conversation with Camerota was extensive and full of argument(Akinwale A, 2010). In any given discussion or argument, it is imperative to accommodate the views of others even when they are against what you believe in. Aslan acted like a person who was righteous and treated others and people who did not know what they were talking about. As a result, the interview turned chaotic at some point. It is difficult to convince a person who believes what he or she knows is the only right thing. For the sake of the whole interview, it would be important if Aslan would accommodate the views of others that were based on facts(Brusko, 2010). For example, some of the issues brought forward ailing the Islamic nations might be problems experienced in some of the African nations. However, that does not justify why they are being carried out in the Islamic nations. Aslan was quick to trash the claims just because he believed in something different from the people in the interview. The third way was to eliminate biases. It is evident that most of the information that Aslan provided was crowded with biases(Ellis G, 2010). The reason for stating so is because he did not want to pay attention to any information that stated otherwise. By so doing, the interview looked like it was more on one side than the other; diverse views were not accommodated. References Akinwale A, A., 2010. Integrating the traditional and the modern conflict management strategies. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 3(10). Awad, G.H., 2010. The impact of acculturation and religious identification on perceived discrimination for Arab/Middle Eastern Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 1(16), p.59. Brusko, L., 2010. Organized Chaos: A Survey of Conflict Management Strategies, Gender Roles, and Status in an Organizational Setting. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, XIII. Ellis G, M.S.M.a.P.B.C., 2010. How democracies keep the peace; Contextual factors that influence conflict management strategies. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4(6), pp.373-98. Ghaffar, A., 2009. conflict in schools;its causes management strategies. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 3(2). Jasperse, M..W.C.a.J.P.E., 2012. Identity, perceived religious discrimination and psychological well-being in Muslim immigrant women. Applied Psychology, 2(61), pp.250-71. Johansen, M.L., 2012. Keeping the peace; Conflict management strategies for nurse managers. Nursing Management, 2(43), pp.50-54. Karakus, M..S.C., 2012. The Effects of Parental Involvement, Trust in Parents, Trust in Students and Pupil Control Ideology on Conflict Management Strategies of Early Childhood. Educational Practices; Theory and Practice, 4(12), pp.2977-85. Khamilov A.B, S.D.V., 2014. CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES. 1st ed. Lamarque, F.A.J.F.L.O.-O.Y.B.L., 2009. Human-wildlife conflict in Africa; causes, consequences, and management strategies. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (157). Paula, P, 2010. Organizational communication and conflict management systems. Nordicom review, 1(31), pp.125-41. Tekleab, A.G..N.R.a.T.P.E., 2009. A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, 2(34), pp.170-205. Tsai, j.s.a.C.J.S., 2009. Influences of Chinese cultural orientations and conflict management styles on construction dispute resolving strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10(135), pp.955-64.